The High Court, in a common order, disposed of numerous writ petitions filed by students seeking to protect their admission status. The court recorded the submission of JNTU's counsel that admitted students would not be disturbed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION Nos.23703, 23704, 23712, 23716, 23720, 23723,23795, 23796, 23797, 23798, 23799, 23800, 23801, 23803, 23804, 23805, 23806, 23811, 23944, 23920, 23923, 23924, 23926, 23930, 23931, 23934, 23936, 23937, 23941, 23942, 23943, 23945, 23946, 23947, 23948, 23949, 23950, 23952, 23953, 23956, 23960, 23966, 23967, 23968, 23969, 23970, 23971, 23972, 23975, 23978, 23980, 23984, 23986, 23988, 23990, 23991, 23992, 23993, 23994, 23996, 23997, 24000, 24002, 24003, 24006, 24007, 24008, 24009, 24016, 24020, 24022, 24032, 24033, 24034, 24037, 24040, 24041, 24043, 24046, 24047, 24049, 24050, 24051, 24054, 24055, 24056, 24057, 24059, 24060, 24061, 24062, 24063, 24064, 24065, 24072, 24079, 24083, 24086, 24087, 24089, 24098, 24101, 24113, 24117, 24119, 24122, 24129, 24135, 24139, 24140, 24212, 24236, 24240, 24307, 24198, 23708, 23714, 23715, 23717, 23718, 23728, 23730, 23738, 23743, 23768, 23777, 23782, 23808, 23816, 23855, 23866, 23870, 23900, 23905, 23907, 23911, 23912, 23915,23918, 23922, 23935, 24196, 24197 of 2014 1875, 1898, 2144, 2999, 3010, 3151, 3673, 4936, 4991, 5154, 5256, 5277, 5295, 5367, 6843, 6846, 6870, 6897, 6904, 6909, 6911, 6946, 6957, 6976, 7006, 7009, 7401, 8308, 8367, 8386, 8402, 8779, 9065, 10538, 10553, 12460, 12551, 12552, 13525, 15768 of 2015
COMMON ORDER :
As the issue involved in all these Writ Petitions is one and the same, they are being heard together and disposed of by way of this Common Order.
Heard Sri S.Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel and Sri S.Sri Ram, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri V.Ramachander Goud, learned Standing Counsel for Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU).
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the students studying in the petitioners’ colleges have completed their course, they cannot be disturbed.
Sri V.Ramchander Goud, learned Standing Counsel for JNTU, on instructions submits that the students who have been admitted by the colleges in these writ petitions will not be disturbed and that they will be allowed to continue to study their courses.
Sri S.Sri Ram, learned counsel appearing for some of the petitioners, seeks to dispose of the Writ Petitions, recording the submission of the learned Standing Counsel appearing for JNTU.
In view of above, recording the aforesaid submission of the learned Standing Counsel, all these writ petitions are disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these writ petitions, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
30.08.2018 tk.
Petitioners
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU)
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
