The single bench dismissed multiple writ petitions by common order, relying on a previous decision from 27.11.2017 (WP.Nos.39315/2017 batch) where the same issue had been disposed of.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
W.P.Nos.13947, 15464, 38991, 37660, 37022, 16747, 17039, 36286, 36287, 36303, 36358, 36419, 36935, 36981, 36987, 37005, 37008, and 37021 of 2015
COMMON ORDER :
As the issue involved in all these Writ Petitions is one and the same, they are being heard together and disposed of by this Common Order.
Heard both sides.
Sri V.Ramachander Goud, learned Standing
Counsel for JNTU on instructions submits that similar issue was considered and dismissed by this Court in WP.Nos.39315/2017 and batch on 27.11.2017.
In view of the same and for the reasons alike in the Common Order dated 27.11.2017 passed in WP.Nos.39315/2017 and batch, these writ petitions are also dismissed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any,
pending in these writ petitions, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
30.08.2018 t k.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WP.Nos.39315/2017 and batch on 27.11.2017Referred¶7
A RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
