The court directed the 2nd respondent to dispose of an interlocutory application filed in an original suit within one week. The writ petition challenging delay was disposed of accordingly.
Direction to dispose of interlocutory application within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.44969 of 2017
ORDER:
The petitioner prays for the following relief:
“…….Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not taking up the suit and not passing any orders on the interlocutory application or on the suit filed by the petitioner against the 3rd respondent even though the suit papers were received on 23.11.2017, as illegal, arbitrary……”
In view of the prayer sought for, there shall be a direction to 2nd respondent to dispose of interlocutory application filed along with O.S. (un-numbered) dated 23.11.2017 within one (1) week from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Petitioner is given liberty to file a memo by enclosing a copy of this order along with copy of un-numbered O.S. and interlocutory application.
Writ petition is accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
________________ S. V. BHATT, J
Dt: 03.01.2018 dv
2
Petitioner
2nd Respondent
3rd Respondent
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
