Writ petition dismissed as infructuous because the cause of action had ceased to exist for adjudication at the time the proceedings were disposed of by the single judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.20968 OF 2013
ORDER:
Sri K. Arjun Chowdary, counsel holding for
Sri N. Satyanarayana, counsel for petitioners, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition
shall stand closed.
______________
S. V. BHATT, J
Date:02.01.2018
KH
Petitioners
Respondents
S. V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
