Disposed

Smt. Bodampudi Rama Devi v. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited

Telangana HC26 Nov 2018WP/42405/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus against the demolition of her property and an interim injunction. The High Court dismissed the petition and adjourned the matter for one week in the motion list, granting interim directions prayed for.

What did the court decide?

Interim directions as prayed were granted; the matter was adjourned for one week in the Motion List.

Smt. Bodampudi Rama Devi Vs Telangana State Southern… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

lL-.-.

¶2

¶3

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT IIYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAN*A AND TIIE STATE^{OF ANDHRAPRADESH} I2s83l

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN

¶6

:PRESENT:

¶7

THE HONOURA,BLE SRI JUSTICE A.R.\JASHEI{ER REDDY

¶8

WP .NO:42405 of 2018

¶9

Between:

¶10

Smt. Khaja Bee, w/o Mohd. Shareef, aged about 65^years, occ. Household, r/o H.No.^9-8- 175, Beside K.B. Museun.r lnside Karnan, Golconda, Hydcrabad.

¶11

Petitioners ANI)

¶12

The State ofTelangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Archaeology and Muscutrs Departrnent, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Director, Department of Arcl.raeology and Museums, 5-10-193, lst tloor, HACA Bhavan Near Cor.rtrol ltoorn Hvderabad.

¶14

llcspolldcnts

¶15

Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court rnay be^pleased to issue an approprirte Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in tlie nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare tl.re action of the officials of the 2nd respondent in demolishing a portion of tl.re premises bearing H.No. 9-8-175 situated behind K.B. Museum, Liside Karran Golconda, Hyderabad belonging to the petitioner without any right or authority and r'vithout following the procedure contemplated under the Statute, as berng illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutionrl and violative of Article 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently dircct tlie ot'flcials of the 2nd respondent not to take any coercive steps without fbllowing tlre duc process of Law;

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶17

Petition under Section [5] CPC praying that in the circurnstances stated in the attidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders officials of the 2nd respondent not to dispossess or in any manner interf'ere with the peaceful possession and enjoynent of the petitioner in respect of tl.re premises bearing H.No. 9-8-175 situated behind K.B. Museum, Inside Kaman Colconda, Hyderabad, pending disposal of Writ Petitiolr No.42405 of 2018, on the file of the Higli Court.

¶18

The petition coming on fbr hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the allldavit filed in support thereof and upon. hearing the argulnents of SRI.K.RAMCHANDRA REDDY Advocate for the Petitioners, leamcd CP FOR ARCHEALOCY (T.G) for tlie Respondents Court made the following.

¶19

OIIDIiR :

¶20

Heard learned counscl for pctitioner,

¶21

Post after one rveek in l\lotion List.

¶22

Till then, there shall bc interim dircction as pral,ed for.

¶23

Sd/- A.SAITAS HI ASSISTANT GISTRAR

¶24

//TRUE COPY'

¶25

For ASSISTANT ItE(;ISTRAR

'l'o

l. The Principal Secretary, nrchacology and Museunls Departrnent, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶30

1. The Director, Departlnent ofArchaeology and Museums, 5-10-193, lst tloor, HACA Bhavan Near Control Room Hyderabad.(l & 2 by RPAD)

¶31

1. One CC to SRL K.RAMCHANDRA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCS TO GP FOR ARCHEALOGY (T.C.), HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD (OUT)

¶32

1. One Spare Copy

I{IGH COURT

ARRJ

DA'tED:06.12.2018

NOTE: POST AFTER ONE WEEK IN THE MOTION LIST

ORDER

WP.NO.42405 0F 2018

INTERIM DIRECTION

,$
w

Smt. Bodampudi Rama Devi v. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Bodampudi Rama Devi v. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.N.Swarna Kumari, Vs The Secretary, Co-op. Societies Dept, Government of A.P

Ramavath Suresh Vs The State of Telangana

Bollikonda Madhu Vs State of Telangana

Mekala Venkata Seshaiah, Vs A.P. Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd.

Md. Rizwanul Rahiman Shariff Vs The Superintendent Engineer

M/s Guru Raghavendra Infrastructures Vs The District Collector