The High Court held that the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, being infructuous, and dismissed it without costs or separate orders on pending miscellaneous petitions.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26314 OF 2012
Date:26.11.2018
Between:
Md. Rizwanul Rahiman Shariff, S/o. Md. Fazululla Shariff, Aged about 62 years, R/o. D.No.22-1-25, Vidyavihar Center, R.R. Pet, Eluru, West Godavari District
.. Petitioner
And
The Superintendent Engineer, APEPDCL, Vidyuth Bhavan, Near Viswasanthi Treatre, R.R. Pet, Eluru, West Godavari District and others .. Respondents
The Court made the following:
2
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26314 OF 2012
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
P. NAVEEN RAO, J Date:26.11.2018 KH
Md. Rizwanul Rahiman Shariff
Superintendent Engineer
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
