This one-line order by the High Court implicitly accepted the petitioner's submission that the writ petition did not survive for adjudication and dismissed it as infructuous without costs.
No order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.40299 OF 2012
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
P. NAVEEN RAO, J Date:13.11.2018 KH
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
