The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous by the Court after the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause no longer survives.
Writ Petition dismissed; incidental miscellaneous petitions dismissed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.1739 OF 2013
Dated 12th November 2018
Between:
Karne Saidi Reddy, S/o.Koti Reddy.
…Petitioner
And
…Respondents
The Court made the following:
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.1739 OF 2013
ORDER:
Sri S.Chandra Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
____________________
(P.NAVEEN RAO, J)
12 th November 2018
RRB
Karne Saidi Reddy
Assistant Engineer (Operation), APCPDCL
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
