Disposed

Busi Srinubabu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC5 Nov 2018WP/39430/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner alleged that ineligible landless beneficiaries were granted pattas due to elections and requested a roving enquiry. The court dismissed the request for a roving enquiry due to the delay but directed the authorities to specifically consider the petitioner's eligibility.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's eligibility for a house site patta and take appropriate action. Request for a roving enquiry was rejected.

Busi Srinubabu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Telangana HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRI T PETI TI ON NO. 39430 OF 2018

¶2

ORDER :

¶3

The complaint of the writ petitioner is that the land of an extent of Ac.1.16 cents in Sy.No.690/2 of Chinthalacheruvu village which has been earmarked as an assigned land is proposed to be assigned in favour of various beneficiaries. However, many of the persons who have been identified for the purpose of granting pattas are ineligible. In those circumstances, the petitioner submits that he had made a representation on 5.11.2016 along with other villagers. The same is not being disposed of.

¶4

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner who asserts that it is only on account of the elections in the year 2014, 33 ineligible persons were identified and pattas were granted in their favour. Number of complaints were made to the concerned authorities giving the details of such ineligible persons, but no action has been taken. Though the petitioner is eligible for grant of such patta, he has not been considered for such grant so far.

¶5

Having regard to the nature of relief which the petitioner is seeking, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to

¶6

¶7

the respondents to consider the eligibility of the petitioner and take appropriate action for grant of house site patta.

¶8

In so far as the relief which the petitioner seeks to conduct a roving enquiry is concerned, this Court is not inclined to make such order, as admittedly allotments were made as far back as in the year 2014. However, it is open to the petitioner to specifically bring to the notice of the authorities with respect to the individuals who were otherwise not eligible to be granted house site pattas, which shall be considered by the authorities and appropriate action shall be taken by following due process

¶9

of law.

¶10

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand

¶11

closed. No order as to costs.

¶12

___________________

¶13

CHALLA KODANDA RAM,J

¶14

Date: 5.11.2018 KPM

Busi Srinubabu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Busi Srinubabu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gourisetty Prakash, Vs The Municipal Corporation of Warangal

K Seshi Reddy Vs Golla Kayapati Narayana

Peta Jakriya Vs Pereddy Ramana Reddy

Komma , Komma Raji Reddy, Warangal Dist. Vs the Secretary, Irrigation and Cad and 3 Others

Smt.Ch.Sulochana, Hyderabad. Vs Greater Municipal Corporation of Hyd.and 2 Others

Jangili Sathaiah Vs The State of Telangana