The court disposed of the writ petition by relying on an earlier order dated 24.04.2018. It held that the issue being covered by the prior decision and issued no specific instructions for the present matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.34750 of 2016
ORDER:
When the matter is called, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner so also learned Standing Counsel that the issue in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order, dated 24.04.2018, in W.P.No.32850 of 2016 and batch of this Court. A copy of the same is placed on record. The operative portion of the said order reads as under:
“In the circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that all the Writ Petitions can be disposed of directing the respondent No.2-Corporation to consider the explanations submitted by the petitioners pursuant to the notices issued under Section 452 of the Act and pass appropriate Orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. If any petitioner have not submitted the explanation, he may do so within three weeks from the date of receipt of the order copy. It is needless to observe that until such orders are passed, the respondent No.2Corporation is directed not to take any coercive steps to demolish the structures raised by the petitioners in their respective premises. It is also observed that under the guise of pendency of passing of the said orders by the respondent No.2-Corporation, the petitioners cannot proceed with further constructions. If the constructions made by the petitioners are within the parameters of the orders issued by the Government for regularization of the buildings, the same may also be considered by the respondent No.2-Corporation, while passing the orders.”
Following the said order and for the reasons recorded therein, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms thereof. There shall be no order as to costs.
2
Office to enclose a copy of the order, dated 24.04.2018, in W.P.Nos.32850 of 2016 and batch to this order.
Miscellaneous Petitions pending consideration, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI Date :12.09.2018 Smr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition is attracted to the principles laid down in the order dated 24.04.2018 in W.P.No.32850 of 2016 and batch.
Petitioner
Respondent No.2
A.V. SESA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
