The court disposed of a writ petition where counsel submitted that respondents were only undertaking road repair without removing petitioners' crops.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.3083 of 2018
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare.
When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare that the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are only undertaking repair works for the existing road but not removing the Cashew Nut crop and Eucalyptus crop of the petitioners herein and, if the properties of the petitioners are required, the respondents will follow the
due process of law.
Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________ A.V.SESHA SAI,J
06th February, 2018 Tsy
Petitioners
Respondent Nos. 2 to 4
Government Pleader for Land Acquisition
Government Pleader for Social Welfare
A.V.SESHA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
