Common order disposing of two writ petitions by directing respondents to pass orders on a dated representation. Writs are closed with no order as to costs.
Respondents directed to pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 29.01.2018; writs disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI
W.P.Nos.2053 and 3259 of 2018
COMMON ORDER:
When the matters are taken up, it is submitted by Sri Krishna Chaitanya, learned counsel attached to the Office of the learned Advocate General that the representation of the petitioner will be considered subject to certain conditions.
“(a) The factual and legal contentions raised by the parties in all
aspects are left open for consideration as and when a lis arises on substantive prayers;
(b) The petitioner is given liberty to apply to 5th respondent for permission to conduct meeting, enclose a copy of this order with the proposed application furnishing, among other details, the date, time and venue of proposed public meeting, number of persons likely to participate and also the measures the petitioner-organization would be taking to ensure maintenance of law and order and prevention of disruption to normal life by such assembly or its members;
(c) the 5th respondent on receipt of the request from petitioner independently examines the request and grants permission by imposing such conditions as are felt reasonable and necessary in this behalf;
(d) the 5th respondent disposes of the application within three working days from the date of receipt of the request from petitioner; (e) It is needless to observe that the petitionerorganization complies with the conditions imposed by respondents and enforces its fundamental right of assembly or protest within the four corners of law.
There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions stand closed.”
as to costs.
______________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J
Date:05.02.2018 grk
Note :
Furnish CC today. b/o grk
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI
W.P.Nos.2053 and 3259 of 2018
Dated: 05.02.2018 grk
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI
W.P.No.27978 of 2009
Date : 28.1.2015
Between:
Adarsa Vyayama Sangam, Perala, rep. by its President Guddanti Narsimha Rao.
… Petitioner
and
The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam district and others.
… Respondents
Adarsa Vyayama Sangam, Perala, rep. by its President Guddanti Narsimha Rao
The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam district and others
A.V.Sesha Sai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
