Disposed

Musuka Veeramallu v. The Government Of India

Telangana HC11 Oct 2018WP/28724/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition concerned with pension grant under the Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme. It directed the petitioner to submit the claim and documents to the State Government for verification and transmission to the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to submit application and documents to the State Government for verification and transmission to the respondent.

Musuka Veeramallu Vs The Government Of India — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO

¶2

Writ Petition No.28724 of 2008

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondent in considering the clam of the petitioner for grant of pension under Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to scheme and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to grant pension to the petitioner in the light of communication Lr.No.112/2376/85 FF (HC) dt.27.11.1997.

¶5

This Court on 30.12.2008 in W.P.M.P.No.37597/2008 passed an interim order directing the respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of pension.

¶6

When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioner by producing the copy of the letter dated 02.09.2009 sent by the Under Secretary to the Government of India to the petitioner, would submit that pursuant to the interim order dt.30.12.2008, the said letter was sent by the respondent to the petitioner wherein the respondent requested the petitioner to provide a copy of the application along with prescribed documents in support of his claim through the Government of Andhra Pradesh (now the Government of Telangana) for further action regarding his claim. Learned counsel would submit that in view of the said letter addressed by the respondent, the Writ Petition may be closed giving liberty to the petitioner to submit his application along with the necessary

¶7

¶8

documents to the State Government for verification and transmission to the respondent for taking appropriate action thereon.

¶9

Learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for respondent reported no objection for this course.

¶10

In view of the above respective submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to submit his application along with the prescribed documents in support of his claim to the Government of Telangana, for verification and transmission to the respondent for consideration and passing appropriate orders in accordance with law. No costs.

¶11

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶12

_________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J

¶13

Date: 11.10.2018 Scs

Musuka Veeramallu v. The Government Of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Musuka Veeramallu v. The Government Of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar,I.R.S Vs G.Srinivas Reddy and Another

Smt. Vijaya Kumari Vs Small Industries Development Bank of India

Marri Siva Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the

Gattu Rajeswari, Khammam and 2 Othrs., Vs Govt. of Ap., Rep Pp and Anr.

Ganga Bharathi Educational Society(Littkle Garden School) Vs The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Pathapati Venkta Raju, W.G.District and 5 Others Vs the State of a.P.Rep by P.P.,High Court, Hyderabad and Anr.