The Writ Petition filed in 2008 stood dismissed due to the non-appearance and lack of representation from the petitioner, who was deemed no longer interested in prosecuting the matter as of 2018.
The Writ Petition is dismissed due to lack of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No.16145 OF 2008
ORDER:
When the matter was called on 04.10.2018, there was no representation for petitioner. Since it is an old matter of the year 2008, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is no more interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
11.10.2018 SS
Petitioner
U. Durga Prasad Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
