The Court dismissed a writ petition filed by petitioners allotted seats in the 'C' category of private medical colleges. The petitioners sought a Mandamus to participate in the second phase of counselling after failing to take their allotted seats, which resulted in the loss of that opportunity.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
WRIT PETITION No.28154 OF 2018
ORDER (ORAL) : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian)
The petitioners who were allotted seats under ‘C’ category, N.R.I.,
in private medical colleges affiliated to respondent No.2 University, have come up with the above writ petition seeking a Mandamus to direct the respondents to allow them to participate in the second phase of couselling.
As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition stand dismissed.
______________________________________ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J August 8, 2018. PV
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking direction to participate in a second phase of counselling merits acceptance when the petitioners lost the opportunity by failing to take allotted seats?
Whether the Writ Petition should be allowed in view of the loss of opportunity due to non-compliance with Supreme Court orders?
The petitioners
Respondent No.2 University
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
