Dismissed

Efftronics Systems Private Limited, v. Research Designs and Standards Organisation

Telangana HC9 Aug 2018WA/1066/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench dismissed the writ appeal. It held that the ends of justice did not require intra-court appeal proceedings because there was no infirmity in the single judge's dismissal of the petition. Issues regarding missing materials in the show-cause notice were noted as to be adjudicated later piece-meal.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed; appellant granted 7 days to reply to show cause notice; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Efftronics Systems Private Limited… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN AND

¶2

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

¶3

Writ Appeal No.1066 of 2018

¶4

JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan)

¶5

We have heard Sri D. Prakash Reddy, learned senior counsel appearing for Sri K. Siddharth Rao, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri P. Bhaskar, learned standing counsel for the respondentRailway Board.

¶6

Show cause notice was issued to the appellant herein on a matter relating to de-listing as a Contractor. As of now the issue is whether the learned single Judge is justified in dismissing the writ petition, in which the appellant sought to challenge the refusal for supply of soft copies of the materials, which were relied on to issue the show cause notice. We do not think that such an exercise could be carried on by the appellant through writ jurisdiction. If the show cause notice ultimately concludes in an action detrimental to the interest of the petitioner/appellant, the question whether the absence of materials, which formed the subject matter of the show cause notice and the non service of such materials sought by the appellant is itself an issue to be considered as against the said final decision would be a matter for adjudication. We are inclined to take such an issue in piece meal during the course of such ------.

¶7

We may also notice that in this situation, the said proceedings are pending before the Central Bureau of Investigation.

¶8

¶9

For the aforesaid reasons, we do not think that ends of justice is required to by the Division Bench through intra court appeal under Letters Patent, when there is no infirmity or illegality in the decision rendered by the learned single Judge of this Court.

¶10

The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed.

¶11

As a last opportunity, the appellant is given 7 clear days time

¶12

for furnishing reply to the show cause notice.

¶13

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending

¶14

shall stand closed.

¶15

__________
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
Date: 09-08-2018
Ksn/ KTL

¶16

¶17

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN AND

¶18

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

¶19

Writ Petition No.38298 of 2016

¶20

(Order of the Division Bench delivered by

¶21

the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan)

¶22

26^th July, 2018

¶23

Ksn/KTL

Efftronics Systems Private Limited, v. Research Designs and Standards Organisation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Efftronics Systems Private Limited, v. Research Designs and Standards Organisation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaga Srinithya Vs The State of Telangana

Kankara Sree Jeevana Jyothi Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Narra Jahnavi, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

K.Dharma Satya Sai Baba Vs The Convener

Mohammed Imran Vs Mnr Dental College and Hospital

P.Venkat Reddy, Vs State of Telangana