The single judge dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the submission of the petitioner's counsel.
No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions stand dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.24791 OF 2012
Dated 12th November 2018
Between:
Man Power Consultancy, rep.by its Proprietor, P.Ismael, S/o.Silar Saheb.
…Petitioner
And
…Respondents
The Court made the following:
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.24791 OF 2012
ORDER:
Sri S.M.Subhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
____________________
(P.NAVEEN RAO, J)
12 th November 2018
RRB
Man Power Consultancy
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation
P.NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
