This order addressed a writ petition for promotion. The Supreme Court held that since the petitioner had attained the age of superannuation, the relief sought could not be granted. The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION No.23869 of 2003
ORDER :
When the matter is taken up, it is noticed that the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation. In this writ petition, the petitioner was seeking a direction to promote him. The relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted at this point of time.
No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J
14 th November, 2018
ajr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction for promotion can be granted when the petitioner has already attained the age of superannuation.
Petitioner
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
