Petitioner challenged acceptance of a responsive bid alleging lack of bid security. Respondents decided to cancel the tender and issue fresh notices. Court allowed the petition and granted liberty for fresh tender process.
Writ petition allowed; liberty granted to respondents to initiate fresh tender process.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.23006 OF 2018
DATED :14.11.2018
Between :
P.Saradamma W/o.Late P.Srinivas, Aged about 44 yrs, Occu : Business, Proprietor of Gowri Shankar Electrical, Government Licensed Electrical Contractor, D.No.50/348/LD-1, Arora Nagar, B.Camp, Kurnool.
.. Petitioner
And
Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., Vijayawada, Krishna District, Rep., by its Chairman and Managing Director & others.
.. Respondents
This court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.23006 OF 2018
ORDER :
A tender notification was issued on 15.05.2018 inviting sealed tenders for carrying out outsourced works engaged through the contractor for providing skilled and un-skilled workers.
__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J
14th November, 2018 Rds
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the acceptance of a bid due to alleged non-furnishing of bid security should be allowed when the tender is cancelled.
P.Saradamma
Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd.
P.NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
