The court disposed of a writ petition regarding the non-disposal of a representation. It directed the respondent to decide within four weeks and closed the miscellaneous petition.
Directed fifth respondent to dispose of the representation filed on 11-06-2018 within four weeks and communicate the decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO W.P.No.22696 of 2018
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj appearing for respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 and 6, Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned counsel for 4th respondent and Sri G.Seshadri, learned Standing Counsel for 5th respondent.
shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Date: 06-07-2018 kvr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of directing the respondent to adopt a timeline for disposing of a representation.
Whether the miscellaneous petition, if any, should be closed consequentially.
PETITIONER
RESPONDENT NO.5
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
