The Writ Petition challenging a fair-price-shop authorization order was dismissed as infructuous since the 2nd Respondent later renewed the authorization.
None.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO W.P.No.21366 of 2018
ORDER:
It is stated by learned counsel for both sides that the petitioner’s fair-price-shop authorization has been renewed vide proceedings dt.28-06-2018 by 2nd respondent.
Therefore, the cause in the Writ Petition no longer survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Date: 06-07-2018 kvr
Petitioner
2nd Respondent
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
