Sana Someswar Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Hon'ble Court disposed of the Writ Petition by recording the written instructions from the police authorities denying all allegations of harassment and confirming no action was taken, finding the petition not maintainable.
What the court decided
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.2246 of 2018
When the matter is taken up, written instructions, dated 29.01.2018, furnished by the Sub Inspector of Police & Station House Officer, Sompeta Police Station, Srikakulam District, are placed on record by the learned Government Pleader. The said written instructions read as under:
“t is submitted that the petitioners may be having civil disputes with the third parties in respect of the land in Sy.No.215/4 to an extent of Act.0.025 ½ cents. However, the allegation of the petitioner that at the instance of the third parties, the third respondent is calling the petitioners to the police station and harassing them to settle the issue with the third parties, is absolutely false and baseless. It is submitted that no person has approached or made any complaint/representation before the third respondent police station against the petitioners herein. Therefore, there was no question of taking any action by the third respondent herein.
It is submitted that the petitioners filed the present writ petition on an apprehension that the third parties may approach the third respondent in the alleged civil dispute and the third respondent police authority may take action against the petitioners herein. The third respondent has no knowledge of any civil disputes of the petitioners with the third parties, nor called the petitioners either on 23.01.2018 or on any other date to the police station. Therefore, the allegation of the petitioners that the third respondent called the petitioners to the police station on 23.01.2018 along with property documents, otherwise to file false case against the petitioners, is false, baseless and concocted only for
2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Petitioners
- respondent
The Sub Inspector of Police & Station House Officer, Sompeta Police Station
- respondent
The Third Respondent
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/2246/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court