Dismissal of a writ petition as infructuous after counsel submitted subsequent developments rendered it no longer admissible for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15245 OF 2008
ORDER:
When the matter is called, learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments, cause in the writ petition no more survives for further adjudication and made an endorsement to that effect.
Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
___________________________
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
14.09.2018
SS
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
