This Court dismissed a writ petition challenging dispossession from agricultural lands despite a stay. Relying on a prior order dated 14-07-2011 in a related writ petition mandating status quo maintenance, the Court held no further orders were necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
W RI T PETI TI ON No. 2 2 0 0 7 OF 2 0 0 8
ORDER:
The petitioners seek writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the lands in survey Nos. 451/ A, 451/ AA and 451/ E in an extent of Ac. 2.10 guntas and survey Nos. 452/ A, 452/ AA and 452/ E in an extent of Ac. 1.68 cents situated at Dandepalli Village & Mandal, Adilabad District, in spite of interim stay granted by respondent No. 1 in the revision petition filed before him by the petitioners and its pending before respondent No. 1 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the aforesaid lands.
2
petitioners raised crops in the lands thereafter and though stay is in operation and the revision is pending, respondent No. 4 is trying to eject the petitioners unlawfully from the aforesaid lands. Hence, the Writ Petition.
3
consequence.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 12-09-2018. U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J. JSK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to maintain the status quo in pending land possession proceedings despite conflicting interim orders.
Petitioners
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Respondent No. 4
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
