Dismissed
M/s. Masineni Hotels Private Limited v. The Deputy Commerical Tax Officer-Iii
Telangana HCWP/1464/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
null
What the court decided
AI extract
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
Writ Petition No.1464 of 2018
Order: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
The petitioner’s grievance in this Writ Petition is regarding the validity of the assessment order dated 29.4.2017, which the petitioner claims to have received on 15.12.2017. The petitioner is aggrieved by the imposition of tax at the highest rate prescribed in Section 4(9)(c) though, according to them, they fall under Section 4(9)(b) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (for short ‘the Act’).
All these contentions can as well be urged before the appellate authority under the Act before whom an appeal lies under Section 31 of the Act. As the petitioner has an effective and efficacious alternative statutory remedy of an appeal, we see no reason to exercise discretion to entertain the Writ petition.
The Writ petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
____________________ (M. GANGA RAO, J)
22nd January, 2018 pnb
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
Writ Petition No.1464 of 2018
Date: 22.1.2018
pnb
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
M. GANGA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court