Disposed

Seelaboyina Nagalakshmi v. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government

Telangana HC19 Jan 2018WA/26/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a thin order disposing of a writ appeal on admissions. The High Court accepted agreement of parties to set aside the lower court order on merits and directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose of pending land revenue proceedings within three months.

What did the court decide?

Set aside the order under appeal; direct Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose proceedings within 3 months;

Seelaboyina Nagalakshmi Vs State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government — Telangana HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND

¶2

THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO

¶3

Writ Appeal No.26 of 2018

¶4

Judgment: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)

¶5

This appeal, under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, is preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.1344 of 2015 dated 27.11.2017. The appellant herein is the petitioner in the Writ Petition. She is aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing her Writ Petition making several observations on merits.

¶6

Sri Sitaram Chaparla, learned counsel for the appellant, would submit that the Writ Petition was filed questioning the action of the Revenue Divisional Officer in issuing notice for dispossession; and, as the matter is still pending consideration before the Revenue Divisional Officer, the learned Single Judge had erred in adjudicating the petitioner’s entitlement, to retain possession of the subject land, on merits.

¶7

Sri K. Purushotham, learned counsel for the 6^th respondent, would submit that the appeal preferred by the 6^th respondent against the entries made in the record of rights, and in issuing pattadar passbooks and title deeds to the appellant-writ petitioner, has been subjected to challenge; and the matter is still pending before the Revenue Divisional Officer.

¶8

Learned counsel on either side agree that, instead of examining the order under appeal on its merits, it would suffice if the said order is set aside and the Revenue Divisional Officer is directed to dispose of the proceedings, and the appeal pending before him, within a specified time frame. As counsel on either side are in agreement, we consider it appropriate to set aside the order under appeal, and direct the Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose of the proceedings initiated against the appellant-writ petitioner, and the appeal preferred by the 6^th respondent,

¶9

¶10

with utmost expedition and, in any event, not later than three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶11

The Writ Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶12

_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)

¶13

____________________ (M. GANGA RAO, J)

¶14

19^th January, 2018 pnb

¶15

¶16

THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN

¶17

AND

¶18

THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO

¶19

Writ Appeal No.26 of 2018

¶20

Date: 19.1.2018

¶21

pnb

Seelaboyina Nagalakshmi v. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seelaboyina Nagalakshmi v. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The District Collector, Vs P.Narsing Rao

The Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board Vs Shaik Akber Ali

M Swarnalatha Vs The State of Telangana

M/S Andhra Infra Projects and Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Secy., Mun. Adm. and 2 Ors.

Mirza Sana Baig Vs State of Tg,Scy,M.Ad.,Hyd,and 2

H.M.D.A. ( Commissioner) Vs M/S. Andhra Infra Projects and 2 Others