‘For the reasons stated in the affidavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declare the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the common proposals submitted by the 3rd respondent vide Lr. No. Estt. AMC (1) 29/201, dated 23-8-2014 in extending the age of superannuation upto 6o years to the employees of Central Market Fund Service while issuing the Final Notification vide G.O.Ms. No. 68, Agriculture and Cooperation ( AM.II) Department, dated 8-12-2015 by extending the age of superannuation upto 6o years in favour of the employees of Agricultural Market Committee service is arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and accordingly set aside the final orders dated 12-4-2018 made in OA No. 679 of 2018 passed by the Honble A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and consequently direct the 1st respondent to consider the common proposals of the 3rd respondent dated 23-8-2014 by extending the age of superannuation upto 6o years of age to the employees of Central Market Fund Service on par with the employees of Agricultural Market Committee Service by passing suitable orders and till then continue the Petitioner in service upto completion of 6o years of his age with all consequential benefits and to pass such other and further orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.’
