Allowed

The District Collector, v. Vissamsetti Venkata Krishna Rao

Telangana HC24 Jul 2018WA/992/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court allowed a Writ Appeal against an order allowing a Writ Petition. The Court held that a permanent injunction cannot be granted when possession is disputed and directed parties to seek remedies in the civil court.

What did the court decide?

The order of the learned Judge allowing the Writ Petition is set aside. Parties directed to approach the civil court.

The District Collector, Vs Vissamsetti Venkata Krishna… — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN

¶2

WRIT APPEAL No.992 of 2018

¶3

JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice V.Ramasubramanian)

¶4

The appeal arises out of an order passed by the learned Judge allowing the Writ Petition filed by the respondents directing the appellants not to interfere with the alleged possession and enjoyment of a piece and parcel of the land by the respondents.

¶5

Heard the learned Government Pleader for Revenue (AP). Sri Ravi Kondaveeti, learned counsel, takes notice for the respondents.

¶6

The writ petitioners filed W.P.No.22502 of 2007 challenging the action of the appellants in interfering with the alleged possession of the lands in Survey No.86/1 situated at Machavaram Village, Kodur Mandal, Krishna District, without following due process of law. The writ petitioners claimed title to the land under certain documents and also claimed to be in possession. But, the Government filed counter affidavit contending that the Government is in possession of the land and the land is in the nature of a Gramakantam land. However, the learned Judge allowed the Writ Petition on the ground that merely because the land in Survey No.86/1 is classified as Gramakantam, it cannot be construed as belonging to the Government. But, we do not know how a prohibitive order in

¶7

¶8

the nature of permanent injunction can be granted in the Writ Petition, when the question of possession is in dispute. From the affidavits and counter affidavits, it cannot be found out as to who is in possession of the immovable property. The appropriate remedy for the writ petitioners is only to go before the civil Court and not to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.

¶9

The Writ Appeal is allowed and the order of the learned Judge is set aside. It will be open to the writ petitioners to go to civil Court and work out their remedies.

¶10

The miscellaneous petitions pending in this Writ Appeal, if

¶11

any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶12

_______________________________________ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ _______________________________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J

¶13

24.07.2018 vs/pln

The District Collector, v. Vissamsetti Venkata Krishna Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The District Collector, v. Vissamsetti Venkata Krishna Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Admission and Fee Regulaotory Committee Vs Churches of Christ Rampachodavaram and 3 Others

Admission and Fee Regulaotory Committee, Hyd Vs Kalikamba Educational Society, Prakasam Dist and 3 Ot

Member Secy, Admission and Fee Regulaotory Committee, Hyd Vs Correspondentandsecy, Hazarath Ameeruddin College of Ednandanr

Dr. Sneha Susan Varghese Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Ceo, Zilla Praja Parishad, Guntu District Vs Ch.Ankamma Rao, Guntur District and 4 Others

Zilla Praja Parishad Vs M/S.N.v.Nageswara Rao,Krishna Dist,and 4