The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of writ appeals filed by the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee in Hyderabad, holding that appeals by an adjudicating body are not sustainable, and clarified that granted directions are not precedents for future years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
WRIT APPEAL Nos.125, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137 AND 148 OF 2017
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan)
Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee for Matters relating to Fee Fixation in Private Unaided Professional Colleges (AFRC), Hyderabad, is the appellant. The matter relates to fixation of fees before commencement of academic year.
The learned counsel for the appellant (AFRC) is correct in pointing out that such appeals are held not sustainable at the instance of AFRC, which is essentially an adjudicating body (see Judgment, dated 18.07.2018, in W.A.Nos.224 and 225 of 2017). We, therefore, refuse to interfere with the impugned order through this bunch of Writ Appeals, however, clarifying that whatever directions have been granted, will not by themselves operate as a precedent for the succeeding years and the matters would be dealt with independently insofar as coming years and block periods are concerned.
The Writ Appeals are accordingly dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions pending in these Writ Appeals, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________________________________ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ
_______________________________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
23.07.2018 Pln/vs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court Court should interfere with the impugned order dismissing the fee fixation appeals filed by an adjudicating body.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Judgment, dated 18.07.2018, in W.A.Nos.224 and 225 of 2017Distinguished¶5
Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee for Matters relating to Fee Fixation in Private Unaided Professional Colleges (AFRC), Hyderabad
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
V. Ramasubramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
