Short order dismissing a writ appeal (W.A.No.885/2017) by the High Court as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
W.A.No.885 of 2017
JUDGMENT: ( per HCJ )
Mr. K. Ramakanth Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this appeal and the same has become infructuous.
Hence the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ appeal, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________________ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ. _________________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J. 1st August, 2018 Js.
2
HCJ & VRS,J W.A.No.885/2017
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
W.A.No.885 of 2017
(Per HCJ)
1st August, 2018
Js.
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
