Bench dismissed the writ appeal (App Writ Appeal No. 722 of 2017) as infructuous following the completion of the survey directed earlier. No order as to costs.
Writ appeal dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
WRIT APPEAL NO. 722 of 2017
Judgment: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan)
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Writ Appeal has become infructuous since with the passage of time, the survey following the directions of the learned single Judge has been carried out.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed.
No order as to costs.
_________________________________________
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ
____________________________
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
Date: 30.07.2018
pnb
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
V. Ramasubramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
