This writ appeal challenged the judgment of the learned Single Judge directing grata payment to petitioners. The High Court found no legal infirmity in the lower court decision and dismissed the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
WRIT APPEAL No.1127 of 2016
Judgment: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan)
We have heard the learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the appellants and Sri P. Ganga Rami Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent-writ petitioners.
2
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs.
_________________________________________
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ
____________________________
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
Date: 2 nd August, 2018
pnb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned Single Judge committed any legal infirmity or err in exercising writ jurisdiction.
Revenue (Appellants)
Writ Petitioners (Respondents)
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
V. Ramasubramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
