(ii) The Municipal Authorities, without any enquiry and without verifying the documents, approved the plan vide proceedings No.BA.No.63/2002/G. As per the said plan, there is no approval for making construction in the entire suit schedule property, as in the alleged approved plan on the eastern side, private site is shown. The plaintiff misrepresented before the Municipal Authorities showing the common passage as a private site and illegally constructed a brick wall in the common passage with an intention to obstruct defendant’s family to reach the defendant’s plot, which is situated on the southern side of the suit schedule property. The defendant also filed a rough sketch mentioning all the physical features. The allegations that on 12.06.2002, at about 8:00 P.M., the defendant attempted to trespass into the plaint “A” schedule property and attempted to demolish the wall “NIJ” etc., are false. The defendant is working as a Superintendent in the office of D.I.E.T., Rayachoti and attended her duties on 12.06.2002 and the Principal, D.I.E.T., Rayachoti has also issued a certificate to that effect and as such, the alleged trespass on that day is false.
