The civil miscellaneous appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear and provide representation on the date of hearing. The order stated that any pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI
MACMA.No.1 0 6 of 2 0 1 2
JUDGMENT:
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 22.06.2018, as none appeared, it was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
The civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________ T. RAJANI, J July 6, 2018 DSK
T. RAJANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
