Gangupanthula Ranga Rao v. Bathula Laxmaiah
Case brief
What is this about?
In this revision petition concerning an extension of time for disposal, the High Court observed that the time granted in 2018 was expired in 2019. The Court directed the Registry to obtain the status and call for an explanation regarding non-compliance before proceeding further.
What did the court decide?
Registry to obtain status and call for explanation for non-compliance of the earlier order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF IUARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2019 IN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4337 OF 2018
Between:
Gangupanthula Ranga Rao, S/o.Late KishanRao
..,PETITIONERY PLAI NTIFF
AND
- Bathula Laxmaiah, S/o.late Sathaiah
- Bathula Narsamma, W/o.l/uthyalu
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order extending time should be extended further.
Whether the Trial Court failed to comply with the earlier time extension order.
Whether Registry action regarding status and explanation is requisite.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gangupanthula Ranga Rao
- respondent
Bathula Laxmaiah
- respondent
Bathula Narsamma
- respondent
Bathula Mallamma
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRP/4337/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Macherla Venkata Lakshmi, Vs The Government of India, Rep by its Dy. Secretary
P.Vijayabhaskar and 3 Others Vs the State of A.P. and Another
M/s. Sri Gayathri Constructions Company, a Partnership firm, Vs The Secunderabad Contonment Board
State of Ap., through Inspector of Police CBI Vs Satender Mohan Sharma