As stated supra, the main accusation is against A.1 for his ill-treating and beating complainant for additional dowry of Rs.60,000/- and unable to bear his ill-treatment, the brothers of the complainant allegedly gave him Rs.60,000/-, with which A.1 started an optical shop. No doubt in the process, a reference was made also against other accused as if on their goading A.1 ill-treated her and further, they abused her for not conceiving etc. It is pertinent to note that some of the accused in the complaint are the children of the brothers and sisters of A.1 and of them, some are even teenagers. For instance, in the complaint itself A.9 & A.10 are referred as aged 17 years and 18 years respectively. Admittedly, all the brothers and sisters of the accused are married and leading their independent life. In this backdrop, as rightly argued by learned counsel for petitioners it will be highly unbelievable that the rest of the accused instigated A.1 to ill-treat her and they also harassed her. No specific and independent overtacts are mentioned against A.2 to A.14 except alleging that all of them conjointly instigated A.1 and they also harassed her. Thus allegations on the face of it are quite unbelievable.
