The Court dismissed the civil revision petition seeking a direction to expedite a suit. Holding that an effective alternative remedy was available, the Court opined that powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India were not required to be exercised and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI
CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON No.2 3 0 2 of 2 0 1 8
ORDER:
This civil revision petition is filed by the petitioners seeking a direction to the Court below to dispose of the suit at an early date.
Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________ T. RAJANI, J
August 24, 2018 DSK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India need to be exercised to direct the Court below to expedite the hearing of the suit.
An effective alternative remedy exists for the petitioners to advance the date of hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI
Respondent
T. RAJANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
