Held that the lower court could not mark an unregistered document subject to objection without deciding the registrability issue first. The case was remanded to decide admissibility within six weeks.
Set aside the marking of Ex.B-2 subject to objection; directed the trial court to decide admissibility for non-registration within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.1718 of 2018
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri KVS Vishnuram, learned counsel for the respondents.
MSR,J C.R.P.No.1718 of 2018
2
above directions. No costs.
stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO Date: 30-07-2018 kvr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the lower court could mark a document for production subject to objection when raised grounds of non-registration under the Registration Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners
Respondents
JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
