Disposed
Immadabathini Annapurna v. The State of Ap
Telangana HCCRLP/9799/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
B.SIVA SANKARA RAO Criminal Petition No.9799…
What the court decided
AI extract
B.SIVA SANKARA RAO Criminal Petition No.9799…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Criminal Petition No.9799 of 2018
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner-A1 and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the respondent No.1-State and Sri K.S.Murthy, counsel for respondent No.2.
2. Undisputedly, the investigation is in progress though there is basis in the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner-A1 of the very attracting of the offences of the so-called statements in writing for not any verbal abuses much less in public view itself is in serious doubt. It is a matter to be investigated by police and to file final report and remedy thereafter is left open, but for that there is nothing to interdict the investigation. However, it is made clear in the peculiar facts of the case that for none of the offences are punishable above seven years the police shall not arrest the petitioner, but for to secure her presence for the purpose of investigation if at all required in writing.
Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J
13.12.2018 MVA
Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court