Court quashed proceedings under Sections 498-A and 494 IPC, citing divorce as a bar to offence, but referred matter to a committee for reconciliation before final dismissal.
Petition disposed; investigation directed without arrest pending committee report; parts closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Crl.P.No.6530 of 2018
ORDER
This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.495 of 2018 of KPHB Colony Police Station, Cyberabad District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 494 IPC, against the petitioners/accused.
MSM,J CRL.P.No.6530 of 2018
2
stand closed.
___________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
25th June, 2018
sj
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings under sections 498-A and 494 IPC are maintainable given the allegation of prior divorce.
Whether the matter is fit for reference to a committee for reconciliation under Rajesh Sharma guidance.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajesh Sharma & Others Vs. State of U.P. & anotherExplained¶6
Rajesh Sharma & Others Vs. State of U.P. & another
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioners/Accused
Second Respondent
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
