Allowed

Shaik Mohammed Zameer v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC25 Jun 2018CRLP/5444/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed compounding of offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a voluntary settlement reached outside court between parties, approving the submission of a joint compromise memo.

What did the court decide?

Permission to compound offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act granted on virtue of joint compromise memo.

Shaik Mohammed Zameer Vs State of Telangana — Dowry and Cruelty | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

¶2

I.A.No.03 of 2018 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5444 OF 2018

¶3

ORDER :

¶4

I.A.No.03 of 2018

¶5

This miscellaneous petition is filed under Section 320 read with 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short “Cr.P.C.”) seeking leave to compromise the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323 and 506 of Indian Penal Code (for short “I.P.C.”) and under Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, as the matter is settled outside the Court and they entered into compromise and filed joint memo to that effect.

¶6

Complainant and the petitioners/accused are present and they are identified by their counsel and Public Prosecutor, produced Photostat copies of aadhar cards in proof of their identity. When terms and conditions of compromise are explained in Urdu language by the learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana, they are admitted to be true and correct.

¶7

On enquiry the parties stated that they settled the issue outside the Court due to intervention of elders and well-wishers and they intend to lead peaceful life.

¶8

The offence punishable under Section 498-A of I.P.C. though not compoundable, it can be compounded with the permission of the Court.

¶9

In view of the close relationship between the parties and as the offence committed by the petitioners is not against the society

¶10

MSM,J Crl.P_5444_2018

¶11

¶12

and the compromise is voluntary, I find that it is a fit case to grant permission to compound the offence. Hence, compromise is recorded in terms of the joint memo filed along with the petition. Accordingly, the petition is ordered.

¶13

Crl.P.No.5444 Of 2018

¶14

In view of the orders passed in I.A.No.03 of 2018, the present petition is allowed in terms of the joint compromise memo filed by both parties. No costs.

¶15

Registry is directed to annex a copy of the joint memo filed

¶16

by both parties, to this order.

¶17

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any,

¶18

shall stand dismissed.
_________________________________________
JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
25.06.2018
Ksp

Shaik Mohammed Zameer v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaik Mohammed Zameer v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri G.Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana

Rudraju Venkata Ganapathi Raju and 10 Otrs., Vs Subash Varma Penumatsa and Anr, Rep Pp.

Dr. Chintala Kishan Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

G.Suresh Vs State of Telangana

M.Anand kumar Vs state of telangana

Shaik Thahira Tabassum, Kadapa Dist. Vs P.P., Hyd and 6 Othrs