Chintamanani Seetharamanjaneyulu and 2 Others Vs the State of Ap., Rep.by Its P.P and Anothers

SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI

CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.13789 of 2011

ORDER:

This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.454 of 2011 on the file of II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Kovvur, against the petitioners, which was taken on file for the offence punishable under Section 498A IPC.

¶5

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the 2^nd respondent. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor for the 1^st respondent-State.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against accused Nos.2 and 3, there are no allegations attracting the alleged offences. But a perusal of the complaint would show that several allegations were made against accused Nos.2 and 3. Though one allegation is regarding fabrication of sale deed, the other allegation is that they used to support A1 in harassing the defacto complainant to get rid of the defacto complainant. Hence, in the above circumstances, this Court opines that unless the matter undergoes trial, the truth would not come out.

¶7

Hence, feeling it not safe to quash the proceedings, the criminal petition is dismissed. However, considering the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the trial Court is directed not to insist on the presence of petitioners on every date of adjournment, except on the days when the presence of the petitioners is required. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.

¶8

______________ T. RAJANI , J

¶9

05^th December, 2018 KSM

¶10

2

¶11

SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI

¶12

CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.13789 of 2011

¶13

05^th December, 2018

¶14

KSM

Chintamanani Seetharamanjaneyulu and 2 Others v. the State of Ap., Rep.by Its P.P and Anothers

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chintamanani Seetharamanjaneyulu and 2 Others v. the State of Ap., Rep.by Its P.P and Anothers

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Nazeem Hussain Vs The State ,Through Public Prosecutor

Chundi Krishna Reddy,A3 Vs Vangavaragu Balakrishna Reddy

Bandi Nityananada Reddy Vs Sandanam Ashok Kumar

Zulfequar Ali Khan and 4 Others Vs the State of A.P. and Another

M/S. Reddy Drugs Laboratories , Vs J.Satish Kumar and 2 Others

Gandamalla Venkata Ratnam Vs The State of a.P., rep. by P.P.