The Court dismissed the criminal petition and enjoined the Court below not to insist upon the presence of the petitioners unless it is very much necessary for the proceedings of the case.
Direction to the Court below not to insist upon the presence of the petitioners unless very much necessary for the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMT JUSTI CE T.RAJANI
CRI MI NAL PETI TON No.1 2 3 6 5 OF 2 0 1 1
ORDER:
This petition is filed by the petitioners, who are A1 and A2, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.135 of 2011 on the file of the court of Special Mobile Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore. The offences alleged are under Sections 420 and 406 IPC.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
T.RAJANI , J
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
December 4, 2018 LMV
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court below should insist upon the presence of the petitioners for the proceedings of the case.
JUSTICE T. RAJANI
Special Mobile Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore
Petitioners
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
T. RAJANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
