The criminal petition was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear when listed twice. The court noted the High Court's power to dismiss proceedings for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI
CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.1 2 7 0 5 of 2 0 1 1
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 05.11.2018, as none appeared, it was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ on 05.11.2018. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither the petitioner appears nor there is any representation on his behalf.
In view of the above, the criminal petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
November 12, 2018 LMV
1 1995 CRLJ 2319
2 AIR 1987 SC 1500
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
K.G. KERALAKUMARAN NAIR v. STATE OF KERALAReferred¶5
K.G. KERALAKUMARAN NAIR v. STATE OF KERALA 1995 CRLJ 2319
RAM NARESH YADAV v. STATE OF BIHARReferred¶5
AIR 1987 SC 1500 · Who else cites this
JUSTICE T. RAJANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
