The court dismissed a Company Petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner represented that the matter was settled out of court but failed to file the required affidavit to withdraw the petition before the listing for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM COMPANY PETITION No. 230 OF 2016
O R D E R :
On 30.10.2018, a representation was made on behalf of the petitioner that the matter has already been settled out of Court, however, since the Company Petition was Admitted, the matter was adjourned to today to be listed under the Caption ‘for dismissal’ with liberty to the petitioner to file an affidavit seeking permission to withdraw the Company Petition as required under Rule 100 of the of the Company (Courts) Rules. Even though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, no such affidavit is filed.
In those circumstances, the Company Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Dt:06.11.2018 kdl
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
COMPANY PETITION No. 230 OF 2016
Dt:06.11.2018
kdl
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
