Allowed

Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., v. M/S. S.V.R. Cables (P) Ltd., and Another

Telangana HC11 Oct 2018CMA/950/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. The appellant agreed to pay the respondent the amount of Rs.1,24,59,000/- awarded by the Andhra Pradesh Facilitation Council without further interest, leading to the appeal's conclusion.

What did the court decide?

The appellant is held liable to pay Rs.1,24,59,000/- to the respondent; CMA disposed of; CMAMP declared infructuous.

Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., Vs M/S… — Arbitration | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy

¶2

and

¶3

The Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Amarnath Goud

¶4

C.M.A.No.950 of 2015

¶5

Date: 11.10.2018

¶6

Between :

¶7

Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited, (APTRANSCO) rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad – 500 082

¶8

… Appellant and M/s.SVR Cables (P) Limited, Anthakapalli – 532 127, Rajam Mandal, Srikakulam District, Rep. by its Director and another … Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Mr.N.Siva Reddy

¶9

Counsel for the Respondents : Mr.Pathuri Appa Rao

¶10

The Court made the following:

¶11

¶12

CVNR,J & TA, J CMA.No.950 of 2015 Date: 11.10.2018

¶13

Judgment : (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)

¶14

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (CMA) is filed against Order and Decree, dated 20.07.2015, in Arbitration OP.No.1642 of 2003 on the file of the XIV Additional Chief Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

¶15

At the hearing, the learned Counsel representing Mr.N.Siva Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for APTRANSO, placed before the Court, letter No.CE/Trans/SE-Trans/ EE(CC)/ F.14CMAs/ D.No.18/18, dated 09.10.2018, of the Executive Engineer/Court Cases, APTRANSCO, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad, wherein he has stated that the APTRANSCO is agreeable to settle the dispute with the respondents by paying the amount of Rs.1,24,59,000/- awarded by the Andhra Pradesh Facilitation Council, Hyderabad, without any further interest.

¶16

Ms.T.V.Sridevi, learned counsel for respondent No.1,

¶17

submitted that her client has no objection for disposal of the CMA as requested by the Executive Engineer/Court Cases, APTRANSO.

¶18

Accordingly, the CMA is disposed of by holding that the appellant is liable to pay, and the respondent No.1 is entitled to receive the amount of Rs1,24,59,000/-.

¶19

¶20

CVNR,J & TA, J CMA.No.950 of 2015 Date: 11.10.2018

¶21

As a sequel to the disposal of the CMA, CMAMP.No.1995 of

¶22

2015, filed for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous.

¶23

______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J)

¶24

___________________ (T.Amarnath Goud, J)

¶25

Date: 11^th October, 2018 lur

¶26

¶27

CVNR,J & TA, J CMA.No.950 of 2015 Date: 11.10.2018

Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., v. M/S. S.V.R. Cables (P) Ltd., and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., v. M/S. S.V.R. Cables (P) Ltd., and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Pavani Steels, and 3 Others Vs M/S Shiv Steels [Secunderabad] Pvt. Ltd., Secunderabad.

M.A. Qayyaum, Secbad. and 8 Ano. Vs M.A. Majid, Hyd. and 13 Ano.

M/S.Sri Anjani Mines and Minerals Vs M/S. Oremet Minerals and Metals Pvt.Ltd

Smt Krishna Pyari Kabra , Kishan Pyari Kabara and 2 Others Vs Goutham Rao R/O Khairatabad, Hyderabad

Srinivas Kabra and 2 Others Vs P. Ganga Rao R/O Khairatabad, Hyderabad

Nadimpalli Nagendra Madhu Varma Vs Nadimpalli Ranga Jyothi