This single-judge order notes that the appellant withdrew the appeal based on monetary limits in a CBIC circular. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
CEA.NO.62 OF 2011
JUDGMENT: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan}
Sri Y.N.Vivekananda, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Central Excise and Customs and Service Tax, submits that, since this appeal is below the monetary limit of Rs.50,00,000/-, the appellant does not wish to prosecute the appeal in the light of the Circular instructions issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs dated 11.07.2018.
Permission is accorded and the appeal is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
_______________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
__________________________________ (KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J)
29th August 2018 JSU
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
