The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn because the appellant did not wish to proceed due to the monetary limit set by CBDT circular instructions dated 11.07.2018.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions stand dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
CEA.NO.4 OF 2008
JUDGMENT: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan}
Sri B.Narayana Reddy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Central Excise and Customs and Service Tax, submits that, since this appeal is below the monetary limit of Rs.50,00,000/-, the appellant does not wish to prosecute the appeal in the light of the Circular instructions issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs dated 11.07.2018.
Permission is accorded and the appeal is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
_______________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
__________________________________ (KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J)
28th August 2018 RRB
Absent Appellant
Respondent
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
