This is a closed contempt final order where adjudication was deemed unnecessary as the charge sheet was filed post-contempt case filing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
CONTEMPT CASE No.2243 of 2018
ORDER:
When this Contempt Case is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Home (A.P.) appearing for the respondent placed the counter affidavit of the respondent.
2. Sri Rajesh Matcha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, stated that after filing of this contempt case, the orders of this Court are duly complied with and that a charge sheet/final report has been filed in the Court of VII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam.
3. Along with the counter affidavit of the respondent, a copy of
the said charge sheet is also filed.
4. Having regard to the submissions and as no further cause survives for adjudication, the Contempt Case is closed.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in
the light of this final order.
There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________________ M.SEETHARAMA MURTI, J
Date: 21st December, 2018
KL
2 MSRM, J
C.C.No.2243 of 2018
160
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
CONTEMPT CASE No.2243 of 2018
Date: 21st December, 2018
KL
M SEETHARAMA MURTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
