The Court holds that the respondent complied with the interim suspension order when the District Collector reverted the respondent to a lower post, thereby closing the contempt case without costs.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M.GANGA RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO.1416 OF 2018
ORDER : (per SK,J)
The respondent is present in person.
This contempt case was instituted alleging willful disobedience to
the order dated 25.04.2018 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2017 in W.A.No.1868 of 2017. By the said order, this Court granted interim suspension of the order dated 25.07.2017 issued by the District Collector and Chairman, Bal Bhavan, Hyderabad District, whereby the fifth respondent was promoted to the post of Superintendent, Bal Bhavan, Hyderabad District.
While so, Sri Andapalli Sanjeev Kumar, learned Special Government Pleader, would inform this Court that by proceedings dated 24.10.2018, the District Collector and Chairman, Bal Bhavan, Hyderabad District, has given effect to the interim suspension granted by this Court by reverting the fifth respondent in the writ petition to the post of Dance Instructor with effect from 25.04.2018.
In that view of the matter, the order stands duly complied with.
The contempt case is accordingly closed. No order as to costs.
_______________
SANJAY KUMAR,J
______________ M.GANGA RAO,J
Date:26.10.2018
PGS/GJ
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent has surrendered to the order of the Court by reverting to the previous post.
State / Public
Fifth Respondent
Sanjay Kumar
M. Ganga Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
